|
|
|
|
Top Frivolous Claims
Despite the public perception personal injury attorneys do not accept frivolous lawsuits. The media often gives cases a twist
to the facts to give the appearance that the jury award is excessive, but there is always a good reason for the jury
verdict. This is not to say that there are not instances when the case is frivolous. There frivolous cases and the number
of calls for frivolous lawsuits is very high. This probably due to the fact that the public thinks the particular case
will result in compensation. Among these inquiries are the following:
.Claimant claimed injury because he was pricked by a needle in defendant's premises.
.Claimant claimed injury because he sustained a cut from the menu at a restaurant.
.Claimant claimed injury because he vomitted after he ate the entire contents of a bag of prepared chicken
that smelled and tasted bad.
.Claimant claimed injury because he found a piece of styrofoam in his potato salad.
.Claimant claimed emotional injury because dealer sold him a car he could not afford.
.Claimant claimed injury because there was sand in clams purchased.
.Claimant sought legal action because employer is making him work too hard.
.Claimant sought legal action because he was fired from his job without a reason.
.Claimant sought legal action because employer yells at him.
.Claimant sought legal action because employer is too picky on quality of work product.
.Claimant sought legal action because a Disney character was stalking him.
|
|
|
|
|